It feels like a simple yet brilliant idea, that has almost entirely disappeared from modern Western democracies (with the notable exception of jury duty).
-
-
Show this thread
-
Imagine a country where the Senate is composed of 100 random people, serving for one year, selected among all citizen between 30 and 60 who have a law degree.
Show this thread -
The more randomness in your system, the less vulnerable it will be to attacks (reaching and maintaining power through bribes, propaganda, etc). Democracy design needs more security awareness
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But who gets to define “valid candidates” considering the hyper partisan atmosphere in US?
-
Lot of things that would have been considered disqualifying just two years ago are now considered “smart” or acceptable “locker talk”!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At first it started with bubble sortition... And shell sortition. Eventually quick sortition proved to be so quick no one really tried to optimize it anymore and it fell from memory. I think politicians should have to solve problems on a whiteboard with the country watching
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
这个想法大赞,在选举中引入随机性,可大大降低腐败及宣传效用。Google 的人智商高知识渊博不仅仅体现在技术上。
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
How do you define who is a qualified people? By vote? By examination? Who gets to define how is people examined? How are they nominated? What is the recourse in case these qualified people make a mistake that jeopardize the life condition of million other citizens?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Socrates had little respect for Athenian democracy and found sortition to be utter folly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.