PyTorch has a lot of marketing firepower behind it, and as a result there's a common misconception that it has "momentum". Does it? I can't tell for sure, but the handful of traction indicators I monitor are showing that its user base has likely peaked around April-May 2018https://twitter.com/vincenzomanzoni/status/1047561148990730246 …
-
-
IMO
@jeremyphoward's fastai library will be the next Keras and transitively popularize PyTorch -
Why not be agnostic and have it support more than 1 framework?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here is the same graph for TensorFlow. Pytorch is gaining momentum relative to TensorFlow, not necessarily in absolute numbers. Especially in the research community.pic.twitter.com/CILuDPF1jU
-
Both graphs are flat. However there is no ongoing narrative that "TF is growing fast"... TF has already reached market saturation (and the market has stopped growing).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm deeply confused about how you could possibly conclude the use base peaked from this data. Time series forecasting is like ... hard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Google search queries over the same period of time for both frameworks:pic.twitter.com/GirjgUTqZ8
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you explain the "heartbeat" pattern there? No-one looks for PyTorch on the weekend? ha ha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.