You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Occasionally I come across papers that make impossible claims. Usually, they don't even seem to be aware that the claims are impossible, and they don't even attempt to address what could be going on to explain the violation of first principles.
This is a dead giveaway that the paper is either mistaken or fraudulent. If you are a scientist of a caliber to prove some foundational assumption to have been incorrect all along, you are going to be aware of the enormity of your claims, and you are going to...
...1) provide incontrovertible evidence and plenty of means of reproduction, 2) explicitly address why you think the foundational assumption was mistaken. If you aren't even aware of the existence of that assumption and the significance of its violation, your paper is pure BS.
At least, one good point is that I don't need to read much further than the abstract to discard these papers.
Do you think that this is a skill you’ve acquired over time or is it something a young researcher might innately have if, say, they possess the right amount of default cynicism?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
