The NYT has had many occasions in the past 3 yrs to take a necessary moral stand on some of the issues that will come to define our time, but has ostensibly preferred to run with gross false equivalencies instead. These headlines look terrible even today; they will not age well.https://twitter.com/LarryGlickman/status/1045624911568490496 …
-
-
Did they also both-sides their coverage of the civil rights movement in the 60s? Serious question.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if the race was significantly tighter in penn and michigan, it would be massive. 70,000 votes is pretty formidable in those states. lots of other things the social networks did played a much bigger role.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.