Personally, I am deeply skeptical of brain-computer interfaces for consumer use cases, because existing physical interfaces such as screens and keyboards do not represent a meaningful bottleneck to our use of technology
Show this thread
-
And information intake (orders of magnitude harder to pull off) most definitely couldn't be any faster than plain reading. Our current 5,000 year-old tech is already maxing out our understanding bandwidth. Which is evident in the fact that speed reading simply doesn't work
Show this thread
If screen + mouse + keyboard is good enough for a 300 APM pro-gamer, it's good enough for you. The friction of physical micro-movement is just not significant compared to the speed at which the mind itself moves
-
-
The mind is a slow beast, with its most basic reactions occurring on a timescale of 100ms. Grasping nontrival abstract concepts requires entire *seconds*
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stay with this: Mouse was good; But VR is *natural*. Your shoe may be good enough for the road, but once you invent cars, it's a different paradigm. With BCI you will most likely not 'spell' your need but state it. NLP/AI will respond, and show you an
instead of 'Apple'.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.