Another common misconception is that open source projects are examples of successful distributed governance. Most successful OSS projects are organized like companies, with decision-making concentrated in a few people
-
-
Show this thread
-
One more misconception: that decentralized governance is inherently better. It's a complicated problem (see cybernetics) and there are no easy answers for large orgs. For small orgs, central power works best in practice (i.e. modern management best practices work well)
Show this thread -
Pushing for decentralization in governance is an ideological stance; it should be considered as such, and not blindly accepted until a first-principles analysis of whether it would be a good idea in the situation at hand
Show this thread -
(It sounds insane to want to replace the Fed, which is accountable and has a clear stabilizing role in the economy, with highly-centralized unaccountable power structures built on top of excruciatingly inefficient distributed-consensus computing infrastructure.)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is the best thread I've read yet on this issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amen! As a political scientist I say this all the time, but people pretend to hear something else!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sounds like bullshit to me. But then again, guy works at Google, has to rationalise working for a surveillance capitalist somehow.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.