Great example of how *not* to interpret the statement "everything in science is up for debate". It means "science is a consensus mechanism where there should be no dogma and everything can be challenged using appropriate evidence", not "scientific facts are lies". https://twitter.com/luckysbaggage/status/1028394800016490497 …
-
-
There are many steps between Science and Policy, and some of those steps have to involve preferences. I'm sure there are people that reject Scientific conclusions - but I don't see how Science can reject Policies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.