Great example of how *not* to interpret the statement "everything in science is up for debate". It means "science is a consensus mechanism where there should be no dogma and everything can be challenged using appropriate evidence", not "scientific facts are lies". https://twitter.com/luckysbaggage/status/1028394800016490497 …
-
-
Precisely because of the "debate" part (consensus-building & evidence collection).
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So my hypothesis that the fundamental building blocks are cranky little dwarves and mirthful gnomes doesn’t get equal debate time because the LHC has turned up no evidence of the little fellas? Would you hang around if someone was shooting high speed protons at you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.