A enormously important but underappreciated thing: as a researcher, make sure your financial incentives are aligned with the public interest & with the progress of science. In particular, your funding & compensation should not depend on your ability to impress non-experts.
-
-
But when you’ve impressed the expert committee and gotten the funding doesn’t the head of that committee then have to impress the alumni donors/government funders etc. to raise their own budget? I’d argue there’s still PR; it’s just outsourced a bit.
-
Yes. I think astronomy and particle physics realised this early on because they need lots of funding for big instruments. This explains why there are people in both who are very good at talking to the public.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@fchollet , please list examples, for the fact we know that academia is based on politics which is for PR at the end of the day, I would be curious if you can list any research got funding without politics, the funding agency must trust to give money just to do genuine research!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.