@fchollet doesn't that include DQN/A3C? 
... seems like super-human performance may be a thing of the past.https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/1023722208508530688 …
-
No, it does not, and I'm sure you can tell from reading the tweets, which are pretty explicit about it. When you look at a game, in your mind, you're coming up with an abstract model of the goals, rules, physics, etc.
This allows you to come up with your own procedural rules for solving the game. A program. Your mind can serve as a program synthesis engine. Just like, say, a deep RL system, or a genetic algorithm, which in this context also serve as program synthesis engines.
-
-
Since both types of systems are program-synthesis engines, you should compare the performance of the programs themselves, not compare biological execution vs. digital execution.
-
Of course, and that's obvious, the game-solving program generated by any human mind when looking at a game is not the same as A3C/etc (although they are also engineered by humans).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.