A enormously important but underappreciated thing: as a researcher, make sure your financial incentives are aligned with the public interest & with the progress of science. In particular, your funding & compensation should not depend on your ability to impress non-experts.
-
-
I guess your recommendations are applicable only to independent publicly funded laboratories?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The anti-Theranos principle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Public perceptions of companies directly affect market value. PR is a critical part of any budding business. That is not to say that this should be in lieu of good r&d but don’t make the false assumption that a company that has great PR is automatically a charlatan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure about the "incentives matter more than you know" part. But I agree with everything else, more attention should be paid to incentives, they are reward functions working at a societal level, shaping societies and individuals in them.https://twitter.com/trylks/status/1024046990651523075?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I deal with this from the other side of the equation.
#Politics driving $$$ to this type of researcher in important, but niche, areas. Hate it when a good project struggles to gain access b/c resources have been over-allocated to feasible, but not go-to-market capable, projects. -
Not saying good things cannot happen from feasibility work. RD&D is sort of our thing in the US, especially with public funds. Never know who might improve on the information later. Drowning out other avenues in the same area due to over-investment due to politics tho? Annoying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.