Reinforcement learning is a very generic and widely applicable framework. If we had any way to solve RL problems, we'd use it everywhere. The way convnets are used everywhere in CV nowadays. The fact that RL is nowhere to be seen in the industry is pretty telling...
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
Maybe. Just because a problem can be seen as an RL problem, this doesn't necessarily mean that this is the most productive way of seeing it. Many problems that could be RL might be better seen as something else (planning, optimization, solving supervised learning, etc).
2 replies 2 retweets 31 likes -
I agree though that we do not in general have good ways of solving RL problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Also, what's really annoying when talking about this is that people constantly conflate RL as a problem formulation with a specific class of methods for solving such problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Absolutely. People equate deep RL methods with the learning framework, which muddies the waters considerably. In any case, deep RL is not well suited for any RL problem that isn't very simple (and if it's simple then other methods are going to be competitive, such as GAs)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.