The format of the problems looks extremely similar, but the content not so much. The very fact that NNs seem to do well on DeepMind's benchmark seem to indicate that it does not achieve its goal of measuring abstract reasoning, and can be solved through simple pattern recognition
-
-
Show this thread
-
My tests are based on colorful little matrices like these. I expect to release the full dataset and associated paper by the end of 2018. Should have happened much earlier, but Keras development is taking up a lot of my time.pic.twitter.com/mPjxgB1TFW
Show this thread -
For more context about why we need such a benchmark, see my talk at RAAIS 2018 (e.g. 13:18):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2L2u303FAs8&list=PLht6tyws1YpSOGz2k6bUC1PibVG7ZiRFB&index=6&t=0s …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it's about time to go beyond Turing test
-
But has the Turing test been truly passed _beyond controversy_ (I'm not sure if that's even possible)? I'm not saying that going beyond it isn't beneficial (definitions of AI & thinking has changed since Turing's time). I just think that the test will remain useful for a while.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, it looks similar to your earlier ideas, you explained to me a few months back.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.