Fate Of Twist

@FateOfTwist_

IDK, THIS

Shitlordaeron
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2015.
Rođen/a 1896.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @FateOfTwist_

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @FateOfTwist_

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    8. lis 2015.

    twf when you summon a demon, and that demon is you

    Poništi
  2. 14. sij

    being on this account feels so cursed since i switched to another alt...

    Poništi
  3. 19. stu 2019.

    This is also a clever ploy to get you to read this :^) (^: :^)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 19. stu 2019.

    Gosh my writing is so stodgy and lectury, maybe talking down, a hint of almost sanctimony? I'd like to change it. Your reflections on how this comes off to you, tone, would be nice. Either replied here or DMs (preferably not in reply to other threads)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 19. stu 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 19. stu 2019.

    If your conception of an absolute world was based on scientific theory in some sense, then I would recommend reading this

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 19. stu 2019.

    I'm not sure who exactly to point to for literature on this conception of science. Neopragmatists and scientific practice people are all good. (later) Putnam and van Fraassen are good. Hasok Chang is good but needs more than a pinch of salt

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 19. stu 2019.

    The person to read for this is Heidegger, and that's where I got much of this from

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 19. stu 2019.

    > Science can easily block you from [having a more complete ontology], if your conception of ontology is purely scientific.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 19. stu 2019.

    Science can easily block you from doing this, if your conception of ontology is purely scientific. > Science can talk about almost anything, but it can only talk about them in a very narrow set of ways

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 19. stu 2019.

    The sense of ontology which tries to be as broad and all encompassing as possible should seek to capture all of that, and more.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 19. stu 2019.

    These are not all just factual but also practical. They are not contradictory but complementary, but also in a sense partially exclusive in that the apple can't be all of that at once simultaneously for you.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 19. stu 2019.

    The chef might think of what can be made from it, what pairs well with it. Beyond thinking, the chef will also have a practical physical affordance to do things like peel amd core the apple, or to macerate it. All of these are ways the apple is to each of these professionals

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 19. stu 2019.

    Consider a botanist and a chef, engaging in the activities of their profession handling an apple. The botanist might evaluate the health of the tree it came from, the process(es) by which it grew on the tree, its biochemical properties, etc.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 19. stu 2019.

    By different ways things are I don't mean a list of propositions that are true or false, and some are true in one activity and some are not in others.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 19. stu 2019.

    An ontological understanding does not just try to capture what there is (and is not), but, also all of those ways/senses in which those things *are*/can *be*, in all walks of life and all activities

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 19. stu 2019.

    While scientists can skateboard, unless they are a kinesiologist or something, they are not skateboarding as/in their capacity of being a scientist. And even if they are, they are skateboarding in a different way, towards different goals as a kid in the skate park

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 19. stu 2019.

    Almost all of our dealing with the world, talking about it, looking at it, reacting to it, changing it, is non-scientific* in the sense that that's not the sort of thing scientists engage in when practicing science. (to be contrasted with un- or anti-scientific which is contrary)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 19. stu 2019.

    Science can talk about almost anything, but it can only talk about them in a very narrow set of ways, and towards a very narrow set of purposes.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 19. stu 2019.

    There is so much to science, to the practical everyday lifeworld of scientists, students of science, people affected by science, skeptics But at the same time, there is so much more in the world than science.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 19. stu 2019.

    Science is not merely a bundle of theory. Science is a real world activity that human beings and human communities spend their time engaged in, making their livelihoods from, thinking, doing, training, practicing, mentoring, building, having fun with, arguing about, and so on

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·