farid anvari

@farid_anvari

Postdoc. Social psychology. Judgment & decision making. Australia ✈ Netherlands ✈ Denmark/Germany

Australia
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2015.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @farid_anvari

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @farid_anvari

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    9. ruj 2019.

    our ( and my) Stage 2 registered report preprint: Replicability crisis and public trust in psych science. Here's a summary. N = 1129, from Prolific (mostly Europeans). We compared a control group who read some basic (historical) information about psychological science 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    You know that person who writes great reviews/comments? Who you’re always wondering what they think of the latest paper you read (or wrote)? Encourage them to apply to be an Associate Editor at ! All ranks & areas of psych are welcome to apply! We want a diverse team!

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    A man was sitting alone, on a bench in a park, singing Bon Jovi's Living on a Prayer by himself. By the end, the entire park joined along to sing with him. (🎥)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Time to resolve long-standing theoretical and empirical debates via a Highly Scientific Twitter Poll ™. 1) Do you mostly think in words or images? 2) Do you consider yourself relatively more anxious or less anxious than the average person?

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Stats advice needed! I have seen the experts argue that instead of testing change scores, one ought to test the end points and add the baselines as a covariate. Did I misunderstand? More importantly, what are the key papers on this topic?

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    [Based on true story] On my way back from Tesco, I remembered the time when I did my first solitude experiment. When I presented data in the lab, 1 prof asked: "Both positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) are lower in solitude condition. Did you code them correctly? 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    I'm starting a thread with quotes from Jerry Ravetz's amazing book "Science and Its Social Problems" (1971), which I believe has not gotten enough attention from the current scientific community, as it is still **so** relevant today.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    If you want answers, do a rigorous, transparent experiment and demand the same of others. Don’t rely on statistical metas and “corrections” whose performance has merely been tested in simulations that represent caricatures of scientific behaviour. You won’t get the right answer.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Some years ago I made a bet with that in the future we’d realise how meta-analytic “corrections”...don’t. This was before our ACE non-replication (prelim. meta suggested “effect”) and now this.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Bad news for meta-analyses: Comparing 15 meta-analyses to multi-lab replication attempts of the same effects, on average, meta-analytic effect sizes are almost three times as large as replication effect sizes.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Anyone have experience incorporating altmetrics into a CV? Any tips / tools you recommend?

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    Please RT and share with people residing in Singapore. I am conducting a short 10min study on how Singaporeans think about the Wuhan virus. You will write short responses & do some surveys. Please email me with any questions at jin.goh@colby.edu Thanks!!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Early-20th-C physics lingers as the ideal model for all science. This distorts everything hideously, because nothing else works similarly. The Stanford Disunity School usefully pointed to alternative models of successful sciences. Has had little effect on practice unfortunately.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima

    All of our Open Science Communities are bottom-up communities, initiated by scholars themselves. Check out these resources by on how to start an Open Science Community: 😊

    Poništi
  15. 23. sij

    after listening to this I can't trust any reviews or ratings on amazon (or anything) anymore. nothing. is. real.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    excellent, enjoyable discussion of my recent preprint on generalization in psychology (). if you don't want to read 20 dense pages, you could listen to 40 minutes of this podcast and come away with a pretty accurate summary. thanks , !

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    "Science is messy, and the results of research rarely conform fully to plan or expectation. ‘Clean’ narratives are an artefact of inappropriate pressures and the culture they have generated." Fabulous editorial from . More editors sign on?

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    ♥️ this editorial from Let's look at what it gets right: 1 Transparent sci is paramount 2 We will overrule recommendations to HARK by reviewers 3 All hi qual research accepted regardless of outcome Imagine if all journals did this...

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    Editorial : "Science is messy, and the results of research rarely conform fully to plan or expectation. ‘Clean’ narratives are an artefact of inappropriate pressures .... We strongly support authors in their efforts to be transparent". Full

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    . and I have just posted a new open face image set on the OSF. 50 male and 50 female faces, all with templates. We’ll add rating data for these images over the coming weeks.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 21. sij

    i know that's not a haiku

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·