Surely even the average climate change denier has to understand the difference between weather and climate, right? If you don't think Trump is either actively malicious or an idiot, then you too are actively malicious or an idiot.
It's hard to "deny" an orthodoxy that is defined by blind allegiance rather than by any specific idea, much less any explainable (not to mention justifiable) theory. Here are some failed predictions: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/30/some-failed-climate-predictions/ …
-
-
That blog posts is basically just a diff between the first report and later ones (with updates predictions). One must appreciate the complexity of climate science and like any good science it is self-correcting. Calling it an orthodoxy is just absurd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
ing your ideology with reality.