Surely even the average climate change denier has to understand the difference between weather and climate, right? If you don't think Trump is either actively malicious or an idiot, then you too are actively malicious or an idiot.
-
-
Replying to @BrandonBloom
Surely even the average climate lyssenkist has to understand the difference between superstition and science, right? If you don't think politicians on "your" side are also actively malicious or idiots, then you too are actively malicious or an idiot.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fare @BrandonBloom
Surely name calling is a great way to advance the debate. Better than trying to understand other people, see where your and their arguments come from and what they break down to. In the end, if you're actively propagating the name calling, then you're a name-calling propagandist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fare
Ok, I’m listening. What’s the argument for “it’s cold now, therefor climate change is fake”?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonBloom
Maybe "climate changists" should make mea culpa or excommunications for those who predicted that by now there would be no more ice on the pole, no more snow in Britain, etc. If you're going to judge the "other" side by its worst rather than its best, expect reciprocity.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fare
No, I’m judging the other side by how their median accepts their worst. The democrats are far more likely to throw their own to the wolves when they act badly.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonBloom @fare
Propagating a false equivalence between the two sides is a handicap that reasonable people should no longer tolerate.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonBloom
You're not "reasonable" if you're into "taking sides" rather than into seeking truth.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fare
You’re not reasonable if you think you can not pick a side and still have an impact. Unless of course you want to start a mars colony. You have to play the game that everyone else is playing. That’s the reality of the world.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So... Green or Blue? Which would you pick for the Nika Riots? And as a Pole would you enthusiastically support Hitler or Stalin? There is more than one game to devote time and energy to. You do not have to play a game just because a majority of people does.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.