Surely even the average climate change denier has to understand the difference between weather and climate, right? If you don't think Trump is either actively malicious or an idiot, then you too are actively malicious or an idiot.
Maybe "climate changists" should make mea culpa or excommunications for those who predicted that by now there would be no more ice on the pole, no more snow in Britain, etc. If you're going to judge the "other" side by its worst rather than its best, expect reciprocity.
-
-
No, I’m judging the other side by how their median accepts their worst. The democrats are far more likely to throw their own to the wolves when they act badly.
-
I'd like to see evidence for that, especially one based on objective badness and not biased by the craze of the day (where everyone suddenly is enraged against something they knew and didn't do shit about for decades). Smells like you're just being in one bubble.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do you have some data on the share of influential climate scientists who made predictions that were widely off? It's a bit too convenient for libertarians to be deniers, as it's one of the best reason for regulation. Looks like it's more about
ing your ideology with reality. -
It's hard to "deny" an orthodoxy that is defined by blind allegiance rather than by any specific idea, much less any explainable (not to mention justifiable) theory. Here are some failed predictions: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/30/some-failed-climate-predictions/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.