Surely even the average climate change denier has to understand the difference between weather and climate, right? If you don't think Trump is either actively malicious or an idiot, then you too are actively malicious or an idiot.
Lots of intelligent people disagree about which side is obviously worse than the other (or whether that is relevant), many of them with cogent arguments. Name calling isn't conducive to anything but rousing feelings of tribalism, which while fun are ultimately counter-productive.
-
-
No, I refuse to acknowlege the “both sides” argument. It’s bullshit. Reasonable people can disagree about economic and social policy. No reasonable person can say that our two parties are equal when it comes to respect for science, women, minorities, etc.
-
As far as I can see, both parties are vastly against science (notably both against economics and biology, though in quite different ways), similarly both against women, against minorities, and basic humanity. They both strive on tribalism and superstition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.