Surely even the average climate change denier has to understand the difference between weather and climate, right? If you don't think Trump is either actively malicious or an idiot, then you too are actively malicious or an idiot.
Surely name calling is a great way to advance the debate. Better than trying to understand other people, see where your and their arguments come from and what they break down to. In the end, if you're actively propagating the name calling, then you're a name-calling propagandist.
-
-
Ok, I’m listening. What’s the argument for “it’s cold now, therefor climate change is fake”?
-
Maybe "climate changists" should make mea culpa or excommunications for those who predicted that by now there would be no more ice on the pole, no more snow in Britain, etc. If you're going to judge the "other" side by its worst rather than its best, expect reciprocity.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.