Reading a paper on teaching English lit, and it says that Star Wars posters where the lightsaber is anywhere near crotch level are phallic. Like, how do you want them to hold it? Like they're desperately trying to avoid an undergraduate telling them it's a dong?
-
Show this thread
-
This sort of thing is exactly what turned me off of the Lit Department. There's so much depth to any text, in its history, its author, the language it's written in, and the past criticism, but no we're just going to keep seeing dongs because Freud said that's how brains work.
10 replies 9 retweets 122 likesShow this thread -
I don't see how any penis-haver can believe that every time someone writes about a pen or a sword or a spear they're visualizing a turgid member. It'd be like every time you want to write you have to fight your way through a phalanx of wieners just to say anything.
19 replies 3 retweets 116 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ZachWeiner
Almost everything is either concave or convex. This means that you’re never short of vacuous claims to make.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Vacuous claims? That's concave claims, ergo yonic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.