Hume argues that you can't justify induction a priori, through mere deduction. He's right. Popper's the one who takes it to a stupid place.
-
-
-
Induction is not deduction—duh. And yet you CAN justify induction a priori—it's just that this a priori includes a stateful context, which both Hume and Popper wrongly exclude a priori.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
E T Jaynes: "Probability theory: The logic of science" deals with it well. What is the Solomonoff reference?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.