Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The Elizabeth Holmes case was perhaps the highest-profile test of whether the Silicon Valley ethos — taken to the extreme — could withstand legal scrutiny. "Now she makes history ... as the first Silicon Valley CEO to be convicted of a white-collar crime.”https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/01/03/elizabeth-holmes-trial-verdict/ …
Trevor Milton and Elon Musk will not be further staining the reputation of Silicon Valley, when they are convicted.
Theranos: Palo Alto, California
Nikola: Phoenix, Arizona
Enron: Houston, Texas
Tesla: Austin, Texas
$TSLAQ $NKLAQpic.twitter.com/7Zi3rGS3SA
Full of scientific luminaries 
There is nothing in any‘Silicon Valley ethos’ that thinks that telling lies is okay, ‘taken to extremes’ (a weasel phrase) or otherwise. Fraud is fraud.
So you seem to be aggravated over the idea that there’s a “fake it ‘til you make it” culture here, something that’s not really up for debate? In any case, I cover Tesla (and also the part of the industry that sprouted Nikola, Levandowski)https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1026872652290379776?s=21 …
It blows my mind that you’re literally a tech reporter for the @washingtonpost yet your insight into tech is *this* wrong.
Holmes wasn’t representative of Valley Ethos at all.
Perhaps if you’re on a different beat we’d find out whether your issue is bias or critical thinking.
(Of course the issue could be both)
If you think fraud is on the spectrum of the silicon valley ethos, you don't understand silicon valley. That would be like saying that the Russian misinformation machine is on the spectrum of journalism.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
