GPT-3 performance on "write this like an attorney" is insane. It even includes relevant statutes if you mention a jurisdiction. This will put a lot of lawyers out of work.
Only the first 2 are prompts...
Conversation
There's more!
Quote Tweet
Here it is in easy-to read still image format: we present, perhaps the most boring part of lawyering, the RFA, fully automated with GPT-3!
This is about half of $100m-funded Legalmation's product, cloned to the first approximation, with three examples.
Show this thread
2
21
But also if you ask gpt3 how many legs a horse has it's often wrong, this might disrupt interns but not professionals
1
1
1
Only if you prompt it naively.
If you prompt it with "This is a question-answer session between a professor of animal physiology" you will get very different results to the playground demo.
Secondly yes, I am v concerned abt career paths for law etc.
1
8
Show replies
Show replies
Show replies
The funny things about this are (1) the idea that writing this kind of legalese is actually an important thing that lawyers get paid to do, and (2) the realization that funny thing #1 is actually true.
1
1
16
Very aware of the irreplaceable "human touch" in lawyering - both drafting & client interactions - but the potential for "robot associates" to increase productivity/capacity is enormous. Like the idea of an "IDE for attorneys!"
1
6
Show replies
Would really be amazing to see what could do with GPT-3.
They’ve already been able to make first year associate quality work for a few years now.
Integrating this could put it on steroids.
1
2
4





