Other candidates score well in one or more areas. @JulianCastro and @BernieSanders have very strong immigration policies. @CoryBooker also has a good overall policy platform. @PeteButtigieg has a strong democracy plan.
@ewarren scores top because she scores high in all areas.
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
At 95%,
@ewarren most represents the values and positions of Indivisible. She has a visionary policy platform, a commitment to building grassroots power, and a focus on really fixing our democracy. That's what we need to defeat both Trump and the forces that allowed him to rise.Afficher cette discussion -
Now, no candidate is perfect, and we'd love to see everyone get to 100%! This is a live scorecard - we were talking to campaigns and updating scores as recently as yesterday afternoon. We'll keep updating as candidates evolve!
Afficher cette discussion -
But speaking of imperfect candidates, 2 declined to participate -
@amyklobuchar &@JoeBiden. They score low across the board. We'll support them if they win, but we worry about their electability. If you can't work with the grassroots, it'll be hard to build a winning coalition.Afficher cette discussion -
This was MONTHS in the making. The Indivisible pledge, a national gathering of Indivisible leaders from 44 states, a 80+ question questionnaire, candidate interviews. WHEW. I'm super proud of Indivisible for getting here. Read all the details here:https://twitter.com/IndivisibleTeam/status/1204766224346943488 …
Afficher cette discussion -
Here's the bottom: Trump is grotesque symptom of a deeper sickness afflicting our democracy. We want whoever wins to recognize this threat and build the coalition necessary to defeat Trump and save democracy. We hope our Scorecard helps get us there. /endhttps://scorecard.indivisible.org/
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I assume negative scores weren’t possible?
-
methodologically would have complicated scoring Trump - how low do you go?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I had a real problem understanding your methodology
@ezralevin & how specific criteria was developed, prioritized, & weighted. For example,@BernieSanders not supporting ending filibuster seemed to count more than#CancelStudentDebt &#MedicareForAll score blurred distinctions. -
Because upholding the filibuster would prevent literally all progressive policy passing the senate. It’s a critical structural reform and is probably indicative of a more considered governing strategy.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.