Opens profile photo
Follow
Ezra Klein
@ezraklein
Columnist, Author, "Why We're Polarized" Host of "The Ezra Klein Show" podcast

Ezra Klein’s Tweets

Pinned Tweet
I’m writing a book with ! It’s about Abundance — how we lost it as a vision, how we can make it a reality. It will build on my work on supply-side progressivism and his on abundance — but where we’re going with it will be fun. From in 2024...
179
2,052
Show this thread
That's not to say agencies should be a black box of spending. But I suspect the pendulum has swung too far towards transparency, and the next era of government reform is going to have to be about restoring enough discretion to get better results.
15
139
Show this thread
Easier said than done. But we've been on a multi-decade kick of increasing transparency and rules and oversight throughout government. Is government more trusted? No, just the opposite.
1
60
Show this thread
I think the same thing is true for a lot of government work. We should give agencies/nonprofits/etc money and let them do their jobs. If the outcomes are bad, we should replace the leaders. But micromanaging the money doesn't work.
5
90
Show this thread
There's a bit of an analogy to social policy here. Maybe it's top of mind because i'm married to the author of "Give People Money" (Hi !), but attaching all kinds of conditions to cash is much worse for most outcomes than just...giving people cash.
2
67
Show this thread
Sometimes it’s not about the agency. Sometimes it’s funders who are trying to justify how they spend their money to donors. Sometimes it’s politicians trying to show they’re tough on budgets. In many, maybe even most, cases the intentions are good. But the outcomes are bad.
2
48
Show this thread
But there’s a big failure loop. An institution falters, or becomes unpopular. Transparency, audits, rules and oversight are applied. The agency has more trouble acting agilely under the new burdens. Outcomes degrade. More oversight and management is applied. Outcomes degrade. Etc
3
62
Show this thread
Another version is that you can trust an agency that gets the results you want. That might mean giving the agency a lot of discretion to spend money, interpret rules, do unpopular things that they think will pay off later, etc. Let’s call that trust-through-outcomes.
2
51
Show this thread
We often talk about ideas like that as ways of increasing trust but in practice they're ways of not needing to trust. It's really transparency as a substitution for trust.
2
57
Show this thread
What does it mean to trust an agency? One answer is that you can trust an agency that is transparent, heavily audited, tightly bound by rules and regulations, highly accountable to the public or other overseers. Let’s call this trust-through-transparency.
4
51
Show this thread
Still very much in the learning phase though, so if you have books we should read, critiques we should hear, case studies we should look at, people we need to talk to — get in touch! (I'm not on Twitter much, though -- ezra.klein@nytimes.com.)
113
171
Show this thread
There is, rightly, a lot of focus on the number of women who die in pregnancy or childbirth. But those numbers say nothing about the intense suffering, and lifelong damage and disability, so many more experience.
27
1,531
Show this thread
One more thing, while I'm breaking my Twitter silence. Something you learn, being near a truly horrible pregnancy, is how common such pregnancies are, because when people know what you've been through, they begin telling you what they've been through.
21
1,532
Show this thread
I'll only add: The idea that any legislator would force her, or anyone else, to undergo this much agony and this much danger, is unthinkable to me. But it's the reality now in much of the United States.
12
1,119
Show this thread
And I share some of that despair. I had this conversation with yesterday, where he said, "It’s easier to imagine colonizing Mars than it is to imagine building new forms of public infrastructure." What a great line. He's right.
25
300
Show this thread
Some people just disagree with me that it's on-net bad. But some disagreement comes from an inability to imagine anything else could play this role, that something better than this could be built or could arise. That it's this or nothing.
Quote Tweet
Not everyone has the platform of the NYT to promote their work and ideas. Twitter has been a great leveler affording access to many. For all the shitposting, it does open up one limited section of the public discourse to many. twitter.com/ezraklein/stat…
10
46
Show this thread
My argument is we've made Twitter our public square and it's poorly suited to that. This is a gamified discourse built to maximize engagement and it shows. Twitter shouldn't disappear, but it shouldn't be this important.
15
167
Show this thread
Twitter goes algorithmic in roughly 2015. It's obviously not monocausal to our politics. But has our politics (or media, or...) gotten better as Twitter has gotten more important? I guess it depends who you ask, but I don't think so.
2
36
Show this thread
But I want to emphasize the "on-net" here. There's lots of good on this platform. There are politicians I like, who use it well. The question here is whether Twitter does more good than bad, overall.
3
52
Show this thread
A politics where there's so much shrinking down to what will 1. fit in this box and 2. get wild engagement is, on-net, a worse politics, the kinds of politicians and voices it elevates are worse. There's a reason Trump was Twitter's most natural and successful user.
2
101
Show this thread
But most things aren't like that. Twitter is built to reward single units of information that generate extreme levels of engagement. Is most of what falls into that category good? I'm skeptical.
1
77
Show this thread
This can be incredibly powerful when there's an outrage that can be contained in one tweet. That's true for many of the cases @Sifill_LDF describes. Enormous good has come out of that.
3
43
Show this thread
The nature of Twitter is it shrinks everything down to units of a single thought, image, video, and then makes it possible for that unit to go viral, reaching communities it would never reach and building a community behind it.
4
57
Show this thread
This is an important counterargument, so let me encourage you to read it — @Sifill_LDF's full thread, not just this one tweet — and try to answer it, and some others, and explain why I think Twitter is ill-suited for the central role it plays in our politics.
Quote Tweet
.@ezraklein this is a deeply inadequate assessment of what has been twitter’s value. I had only been on the platform a short while when, on a Sat afternoon, I saw the rising anger & intense response to the killing of a young Black man whose body lay in the streets for hours. twitter.com/ezraklein/stat…
Show this thread
51
259
Show this thread
"Everyone on Twitter is talking about X" has driven too much elite thinking for too long. It's done that because it feels like some vox populi. Soon it'll be Musk's game, and he'll never let you forget it, and he will wield its powers constantly. It's a very different vibe.
17
377
Show this thread
This is not a public square. It's a gamified discourse posing as a public square, and it does not have our best interests at heart. The way to "fix Twitter" is for people to see it for what it is, and treat it as that.
47
1,274
Show this thread
I don't think Twitter collapses under a Musk regime. But I think its contradictions become unbearable to many, in a way that weakens the cultural hold it has on key industries and institutions, and that will be a good thing!
7
313
Show this thread
How does a viral tweet or a flourishing following feel if it's to the greater glory and profits and influence of Elon? Maybe great if you love him. Pretty unsettling if you don't.
18
227
Show this thread