@eyokley NFL policy wouldn't - http://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/nfl-ewc-sexual-orientation.pdf …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eyokley@JaneDueker That couldn't be further from the truth. Mo. law already prohibits sex harassment & discrimination. -
@eyokley@JaneDueker not saying that an designation of a new protected class lacks merit, just noting that these claims get tried presently -
@CLFranklinTLP so if you get fired solely b/c you are gay, there is a MO cause of action?
-
@JaneDueker Not as a matter of strict pleading, perhaps not. But most cases fall under S.213's prohib on sex discrim & harass.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@eyokley NFL rules prohibit firing for that reason though (supposedly). I get what yr saying, but wouldn't that trump state law?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eyokley@JaneDueker And that's why this die-hard Cardinal fan will never live in Missouri..and that bothers me.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eyokley awesome note.... Welcome to the 17th century?!...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eyokley now that's interesting. Which law? I guess the Human Rights a Commission statute doesn't cover sexual orientation?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.