So add $10 million to @GovJayNixon's expanded education funding proposal. We're getting up there pretty high already. #MOLeg
.@jdavidsonlawyer Math his hard. $10M + $36.7M + $20M + $15M + whatever his foundation number is ($595M hole) = edu number is gonna be high.
-
-
.
@eyokley the increases you mention are not "high," they are about $15.25 per year for each person in Missouri -
@jdavidsonlawyer@eyokley point is his promises exceed the # of $ we will receive, which as Eli sd, makes those promises high. -
@FitzpatrickMO@eyokley 1/? if your reading is correct, it makes the statement even worse. To suggest that we know where state revenues -
@FitzpatrickMO@eyokley 2/? will be in July 2015 to charge anyone with false promises or being high is extremely misleading. All this lies -
@FitzpatrickMO@eyokley 3/? doorstep of Hancock, failure to update tax system Ex. Google is untaxed with 50% of all media rev. in US.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@eyokley high = your very uniformed judgment < far less than what we spent 2002 and before and I won't even go into what we spend vs othersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eyokley@jdavidsonlawyer It's easy to promise a big number when you walk away from Consensus Revenue & make up your own number. -
@RyanSilvey@eyokley actual revenue will be what it will be. my concern is journalist should only report the news
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.