The question isn't just why one person should be so much wealthier than others, but why should one person be able to dictate the labor of millions? By what right?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everybody knows money isn’t happiness. But ...money can buy a nice yacht filled with hookers and, I know no one who owns a yacht filled with hookers who isn’t happy.
-
I am willing to disprove this argument, given the chance.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
those who have billions don’t have billions in the bank; the billions are usually already invested in businesses and projects, enabling people who very much want to do the things they have been asked. the billionaire is a decider through wisdom, not tyranny
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is not the money per se that is evil in of itself. It is the influence it can buy amongst the corrupt to change the rules against the poor and it is the status that fools bestow upon it. At this point $$ is no longer a sign of productivity but a means to control the free.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is essentially what they do. They hire people to produce more wealth than they're paid, enriching themselves ever more. To hire as whimsically as possible, using their power to ensure that poor people have to keep taking their awful low paying jobs just to survive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is maybe the worst take I've ever seen from a philosopher, and I read the Meno twice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The million people ain't doing it for free. They are getting the money for it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.