Philosophy teaches you to question the question of the question of the question, then the questioner. Then you wonder the meaning of life before releasing people have been trying to work it out for thousands of years, and here the question still lies.
-
-
-
*realising*

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure if that relationship is true. To give you a counterexample, Hawkings used to think that philosophy is useless but not because society does not need to change, mainly bc he thought that science has taken up the lead in answer fundamental questions. What do u think?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
Oh no, you are terribly wrong! There’s also a special circle of hell of those who think the science made philosophy obsolete. They are avid progressives and really scary ones.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neil deGrasse Tyson, a good example
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wanted to pose you a Socrates-style question, but realized it would be obnoxious & went to drink a poison slower than hemlock, instead.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Capital thrives on criticism, its state even encourages it to some degree - it helps them to determine where the limits are that need to be tackled or circumvented, and which inner-systemic "revolution" to launch next to fight the fall of the profit rate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hence the industry of tv and tabloids. And possibly Facebook.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We're increasingly live in a society where questioning everything might be seen as a malignant act, and I guess it's pretty obvious why.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.