-
-
-
Ironically a society in which food was shared and societally owned would have no hunger problems, while under capitalism edible food is discarded while people starve or miss meals because they can't afford it and thus won't make profits... But sure, base your politics off memes
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Communism may get minimum standard of living for everyone. And no one would be unemployed, but after some time communism becomes authoritarian and very bureaucratic making life very difficult. Although everyone gets minimum wages for sure, but quality of goods produced is average
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coincidentally, just wondering today whether one's class consciousness & class struggle could theoretically conflict w one's species being - w the caveat, don't mean to spark unending sectarian warfare on this issue...pic.twitter.com/jZyY5lcjFP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read some Kropotkin. It's possible to just not be dicks and share production without a powerful State.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what they end up doing is sending people to gulags and a splitting up families for a host of reasons. But I hear Siberia’s a nice place.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.