Doesn't that, in turn, imply that communism does not befit the nature of man?
-
-
-
No it implies that economists tend to operate on unexamined premises
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Or the other way around.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You look pretty confused regarding: - the banking system - what "scarcity" means - fiat money - the fact that both the world and the economy aren't zero-sum games
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes yes. Other times we trust each other and work together, despite the incentives in the current system encouraging the opposite.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every human brain is constantly fighting between its rational and emotional side (or long- and short-term expectations), with the winner chosen by a long chain of decisions in a chaotic system. So utopias are a silly concept.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are correct; we are not rational creatures, rather we are emotional creatures who can rationalize...but admitting that our emotions, that is, how we feel, is really what drives us is very uncomfortable. It implies we are not "strong" or "in control".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You might be wrong... Most people may be rational actors, yet relying on the self-interest with short-term outcomes, not on the enlightened self-interest with long term goals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol no
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nah, we just suck at prisoner's dilemma and cooperating in general.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.