Have you noticed that those who promote Darwin's evolutionary theory reject social Darwinism, and those who support social Darwinism reject evolutionary theory?
Libertarians think they are the "rational" ones if they remain calm while describing how poor people should die if the shareholders calculate that it will make them more money.
-
-
-
Because social Darwinism had no scientific basis, relied on hindsight basis for its theories, and was used to justify racism
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Libertarianism is anarchy for rich people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are rational, as in rationalizing misery-to-profit ratios...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Someone has to make the hard decisions” that someone else has to suffer for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
No libertarian with whom I've ever engaged could ever give a convincing answer as to how the roads will get built or police, fire and military get paid under their tax-free libertarian utopia.
-
I've literally seen someone say "I'm pretty sure a private company would've built the roads if needed. Who says we really need all the roads we have?" I just . . . don't get it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They are all real life Mr. Potter and Mr. Burns.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At least some libertarians do not believe the business corporation (at least in its present state) should exist, because it is the state that vouchsafes limited liability for shareholders. There are a lot of different kinds of libertarians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.