Step 1: Create the need for extra personal storage. Step 2: Restrict access of artificial need through commodification of patriarchical gender roles.
Never forget, Capitalism is the reason women's clothing doesn't have pockets. If outfits were controlled by the people, it would be pockets for one and all.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Men are the reason women's clothing doesn't have pockets.
-
capitalism is the reason men are able to control women's clothing
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I... feel like there is a pun I’m missing here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For sure. Capitalists are definitely not trying to make products that people want to buy! What's funny is that you seem to believe that a centrally planned economy gives people what they REALLY want, not an economy based on individual consumers making individual choices.
-
Interesting. So the 24/7 societal hypersexualization and objectifaction of women forcing a narrow range of "attractive" attire isn't the fault of capitalism. Just the result of individual consumer choices.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@anni42 as you taught me - pockets are totally political! Fight the power! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.