You must either abandon a strong correspondence theory of truth, admit absurdities into your ontology, or say much of language is nonsense.
Show this thread
I've read lots of philosophy, but only found one piece of REAL wisdom: Semantic realism cannot be reconciled with counterfactual statements.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is no time for baseball talk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But what if there were infinite possible worlds (including some that are endless suffering) that gave truth values to counterfactuals?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Bored now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who gets the kids?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just one ???? Three sheets of philosophy maybe
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OK but one misses so much fun that way - cf. Lewis on nested spheres of possible worlds etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So 'truth comes after being' is why the Humean remains ignorant about
#counterfactuals ?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.