That's a weird assumption to make. If a person's interests were health, education, security, economics, infrastructure, or a range of 1/2
-
-
-
Others, then voting for Trump was voting against their interests. If you're reading people who only focus on money, read better writers. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I always assume they're referring to Darwinian reproductive interests, but then I remember that's never what journalists mean.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's an assumption that the right way to vote is selfishly.
-
Seems to be the status quo, personally i can't help but vote idealistically even if it goes against my own best interests
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I thought the strange assumption was that deep down everyone believes the same as 'I' do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the only analysis that's true is materialism, ideology is a lie!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmm... But wedge issues force a decision between economic vs. socio-cultural/other interests. So the cynicism should be identified.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Money is a lowest common denominator that can be assumed even when you don't understand a group. Finding other motives demands actual work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.