Why is it that whenever people bravely defend freedom of speech it is always for someone already massively empowered to speak?
People already on TV and stuff don't need to be defended: they have freedom of speech. Millions are effectively silenced, institutionally.
-
-
true but twitter and other platforms can get yours or other messages out there I listen to a variety of people
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@existentialcoms Freedom of the press is reserved for those that own one.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
i seek to defend both but give latter the preference proportional to how silent they have been empirically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Twitter has democratized speech. For instance, I have 16 followers and only 12 of them are sex bots! Take that breitbart!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.