@keithfrankish ... or maybe we just know more about the reasons. 'Delusions' often have at least a grain of truth.
The difference between a philosopher and a crazy person is that the philosopher has good reasons for believing their crazy ideas.
-
-
-
Yes, indeed. Some delusions may be rational responses to weird experiences.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
since where n when reason or reasonables based in or on or of a moralising good or bad nature or accredited out or in come?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@philosophybites if good reason then not crazyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MrHairulAnuar not necessarily good though, just convincing or reasonableThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well, to be honest, so does the crazy person. For them. It's just that you wouldn't agree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
/cc
@lorenzlm Da muss ich an Ihre Vorlesung von Dienstag denken – die guten Gründe.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The crazy person has good reasons but bad arguments. The philosopher's reasons are also bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.