@existentialcoms this is a clinician's fallacy.
Why is it when the internet gets all righteous over free speech, it is always to defend those who are already the most empowered to speak?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms Untrue. The internet has defender even the most irrelevant humans like Bahar Mustafa or Gregory Allan Elliot.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
@existentialcoms Because we're on their team.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms Because defending people isn't based on how much they talk. It's agreeing with whoever you're defendingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms Free speech is righteous....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms There probably are people who care about less empowered people's free speech, but you don't hear as much from themThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms Is there a meaningful, generic "most empowered to speak"? And are there perhaps considerations that trump power?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms Only power censors. An "empowered" voice isn't powerful if it's being censored. Being censored=being weak, needing support.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.