@existentialcoms @OhhhhhhhHenry THIS IS EXACTLY RIGHT AND WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@existentialcoms @Tinawanis good point. Science never tells us why. Only ever tells us how, what, sometimes when. -
@mroadrider@existentialcoms @Tinawanis why need a why? There is no reason for universal laws to give us a why. Just that it does. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@existentialcoms@fatneckbeardguy But metaphysics has to come after physics. Says so on the tin! -
(1/3) Nonsense- Everything in the universe was created, therefore the universe itself must have been created, and the universe...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@GRIMACHU@double2@existentialcoms @Zoobinoff Psychology =/= neurology.
End of conversation
-
-
-
@double2@existentialcoms @Tinawanis science is strictly observation. Anything beyond that is assumption. -
@mroadrider@double2@existentialcoms @Tinawanis all philosophy does is assume and muse. Better to figure things out that we can.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@double2@existentialcoms @Tinawanis we assume there's life elsewhere - it's never been observed -
@mroadrider@double2@existentialcoms @Tinawanis who assumes? Life on Earth exists, ergo possible to exist elsewhere. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.