"The economy" isn't en end to itself. It's an abstract concept for production to meet needs. If we all chill at home, our needs are reduced, so it's fine for everyone if "the economy" tanks. Well, not everyone, people who extract billions from workers' production will be pissed.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
If you're thinking losing 1/6 of the year's production wouldn't be a big hit to any economic system, you're living in IdeologyLand.
-
It’s a pandemic. Of course it’s a “big hit”. But it’s clearly one we can recover from economically. In fact, it’s the job of markets to allocate resources to best weather the real danger, not the other way around.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Contrary to the right's bleeting, the purpose of our welfare state is to shore up and bolster Capitalism against its inevitable top-heavy collapse. Any structural change that loosens the coupling between welfare/healthcare and employment is an existential threat to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well ... hunting and gathering and agriculture tolerate even less pause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Literally can't pause for a pandemic and they want us to choose the pandemic
-
If you're system is too weak too accept the hard truths of the world, like pandemics and natural disasters, maybe it's time to modify the system
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
With the obvious caveat that, the way the *current* economy works, a shutdown is disastrous for quite a lot of workers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's what I've been saying. But, what is next?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.