I get the rhetorical usefulness of lines like this in an election, but equating tax cuts to "socialism" is the height of absurdity. If anything, the rich don't have "socialism" because they get government money, they have socialism because they own the means of production.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it’s a reference to MLK
-
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe your rhetoric wasn't connecting w/ people. If Bernie's rhetoric connected with people, enabling more people to envision a better world beyond Capitalism appreciate Bernie's work and then set out to push people further left instead of whining about his rhetoric.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. What's often called "socialism for the rich" is actually just regular capitalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we're not really at the stage of abolishing money yet so...
-
I mean, the US could abolition money tomorrow. Global economics isn't a Natural Physical Law, it's a human construct.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Heard. I think of Sanders' framing is meant to be a bridge. First we have to normalize the term socialism, take the Boogeyman out of it. Think of it as remedial politics for a severely underdeveloped popular understanding. Maybe someday
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually I want the government to give me money, as well
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.