In the 80s, at the height of protests in South Korea, the most radical student factions were the engineering students, because of their ties to the auto workers union. Never dismiss the radical potentials of those who are and will be part of the industrial proletariat.
We need philosophy because no one was ever radicalized into revolutionary politics from learning mechanical engineering. Technical skills will only make the system more efficient, but we always need at least the possibility of reimagining the system entirely.
-
-
-
but without the philosophy they would never know what they are fighting for
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I get less angry when I remember this is what you look like. You’re not starting any revolution
pic.twitter.com/FD3tjR7aoT
-
Is this... another win for... physiognomy?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is a bad take, because it implies that philosophy can only be good if it is better than some other discipline, and invites some kind of competitive ranking. Neither capitalist economics nor revolutionary inspiration are required to justify an academic discipline.
-
"saying that a hammer is the best tool to deal with the problem of a nail invites some kind of competitive ranking."
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
ah yes only philisophy undergrads have the brainpower necessary to understand leftism
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
Make funny cartoons and do less of the generalizations about life actual philosophers get paid to do.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.