"Yes, you're right, but for all the wrong reasons." I hate it when that happens.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Time to put my controversy hat on. Frustration doesn't excuse ignorant Speech, but philosophers often do not realize how exhausting it can be for scientists to be lectured about their profession by those who seem to have no interest in learning much about it.
-
There is an elitist tendency in science, and philosophy isn't a lower discipline or anything, but unless you've been involved in the field, you have no idea how many people who are unwilling to even attempt complex equations etc. will try to lecture you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Science could use a few lessons in semantics. E.g., 'dark matter' is not dark but invisible..
-
Well, that one works because the reason it's invisible is because it apparently doesn't interact with electromagnetism, and thus doesn't emit light.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
“What the nerd cannot speak about, he must pass over in silence.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wittgenstein is cool and all, but it drives me up the wall when philosophers are talking about a topic in physics, and start talking semantics. Like some physics terms have broader meanings outside the field, but they're tightly defined, and semantics have nothing to do with it
-
I've listened to wayy too many episodes of In Our Time where someone goes "but atoms are like mini solar systems" or something of the ilk
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's not JUST semantics. It is semantics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fine and perfect (apart from the word "just"). Scientists should care more about meaning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.