You shouldn’t have to. You still should. That’s the difference.
-
-
-
No, you should have to.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
“If it was truly important the ambulance company would pay the driver to get out of their way “
-
The obvious solution: everyone who is inconvenienced by an ambulance can simply file a claim with the ambulance company, proportional to their hourly earning potential
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't see why general empathy would have to disappear. Just like socialism can't force selflessness, libertarianism can't force extreme selfishness.
-
the difference is that the actual policies and societal structures that libertarians support actively discourage and punish empathy
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That would be state sponsored violence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would they need to? Would a true libertarian even be using public roads?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
1 of the greatest experiences & examples of libertarianism today happens when you're in a pack of cars on the highway, & you realize everyone is consciously aware of each other, voluntarily and consciously signaling, its like going to heaven, it literally is an emotional orgasm.
-
So you actually think that speed limits, cops around the corner, traffic lights, etc. have no impact on people's behavior, eh? Ah, the delusions of libertarianism.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.