This is just not true. Socialists believe in communal property rights. Capitalists believe in individual property rights. And it is not an easy decision, or one that is black or white.
The socialist position is that humans should control property. The capitalist position is that property should control humans. This should not be a difficult decision.
-
-
-
It is though. Individual property rights means that proprietors are entitled to wealth created by assets. I can buy 9 computers and hire ppl on min-wage and keep the rest of the revenue without having lifted a finger. Sounds pretty absurd, especially in this day and age.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You don't like having to pay rent, we get it. We got the first million times you tweeted about it. Give it a bloody rest.
-
I think it is more that socialists feel that rent shouldn't take up more then half of ones income.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yet both have this in common: They are fantasies created by humans, and run by oligarchs and dictators and such who don't seem to want to "share" with the rest of us. Same sack of crap, different feet stepping into it.
-
Galaxy brain
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Landlords are humans no?
-
Highly questionable
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He who controls the Spice controls the universe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The socialist position is that the STATE should control property over the means of production. Not humans.
-
No. The socialist position is that the STATE should become obsolete. Not our humanity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.