I'm not sure I follow. Perhaps emotivist notation can help. Are you saying that H!(Ph)&B!(Ph+ -> SmS) Where Ph — Philosophy, Ph+ — Philosophy with math symbols, SmS — Smart Sounding guys Or P1 H!(Ph) P2 SmS -> Ph+ -> !Ph C B!(SmS) If it's the second, there's a non-sequitur in P2
philosophy was great until the fucking nerds took over and started putting math symbols every other sentence just to try to sound smart
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Philosophy was great when you had to know maths and geometry in order to call yourself a philosopher.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same but economics
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Quit Quine-ing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is completely orthogonal to the issue.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
LOL yeah analytical philosophy is trash welcome to the 20th century
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dare you to say that to me in predicate calculus!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.