It doesn't mean they're against change. The change just has to be a good one.
A free market is a good thing, but I don't think a market is truly free when land and resources function in a nearly feudalist way.
A land dividend balances the equation. #Georgism
-
-
-
I'd argue that georgist land value tax & dividend is a redistributive schemes that makes a market system less capitalistic and more distributist though. It starts to look more like Rawls' property-owning democracy and less like what Marx, Hodgskin, and others called "capitalism."
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. They don't really want equality of opportunity just formal legal equality that allows the privileged to get ahead based on advantages they've inherited.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds an awful like that guy in high school complaining about the jocks getting all the hot chicks.
-
Agglomeration is a real problem in Economics, going bac to Adam Smith and even the Romans, it has been a social problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This one has always bugged me. "Equality of opportunity" isn't a thing that exists, given a system in which a person's opportunities are largely determined by their parents' outcomes, which are decidedly unequal.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I worry less about the few born millionaires and more about the much larger proportion born in poverty. If everyone can have Maslow’s basic needs, I don’t care if some have more. Currently the deck is stacked against anyone born in poverty, regardless of anecdotal exceptions.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.