Let me correct that not ‘money’ but ‘somebody else’ money’.
It's amazing when people talk about the conflict between workers and capital and think they can be a reasonable centrist between the two. Like…the workers are people, capital is just money. You want to give equal consideration between human beings and dollar bills.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
The conflict between workers and the money other people have that was generated by workers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Countries with more capital per worker are more prosperous = people are better off
-
Countries with better capital distribution = people are a lot better off
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or you can call it labour and capital if you want to talk about structures.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The centrist is probably just a pragmatist, striking a balance between equality and the reality (and benefits) of the profit motive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the concept of "capital" is meant to be to referred to THE PERSON that puts the money, not just the money. For example, if you inherited shit tons of money (which mostly, happens), you would like that money to be productive.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.