It's because human babies just aren't very good as far as babies are concerned. Hate to be the bearer of bad news, that's just the truth
The thing I legitimately don't get about evolution is that we find like every other animal baby cuter than human babies. Baby cat? Cuter. Baby elephant? Cuter. Baby kangaroo? Cuter. Baby bear? Cuter. Baby raccoon? Cuter. Not even close. Explain this, science man. You can't.
-
-
-
Yes, THANK YOU. I’ve been trying to explain this to my child for years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because we killed the ones the werent cute.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
baby owls: not quite
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Cuteness is the only objective aesthetic measure. The truth is he truth, and the truth is our babies are uuuugly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The evolutionary benefit of finding an animal cute is so you don't kill it and it grows up to be a larger animal that you can make a couple meals out of. If a baby human grows up it just becomes another mouth to feed.
-
Dogs actually think we're cute, so at one time I suppose it was advantageous for them to allow us fatten up.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If we are the so-called dominant spices, it is clear that we should have a minus in cuteness. Monsters often don't look nice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On any airplane: - Reception: sir, you will be seated next to a baby... - Me [interrupting]: oh nooo, please! - Reception: ...panda. - Me:pic.twitter.com/MRIrn99B5w
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.